Consultations On Islamophobia Are Not An Alternative To Action

This article was originally published on March 27, 2018 on Huffington Post Canada.

This article was originally published on March 24, 2018 on Rabble Canada.

It’s hard not to feel disappointed that the government’s response to last month’s M-103 report is, ironically, more consultations.  The M-103 report itself was the result of hearings with 77 witnesses. And despite being mandated to finish within six months, the M-103 report took almost a year to complete.  For the religious communities involved, it’s fair to question whether the government really cares to concretely address the problem of Islamophobia and religious discrimination in Canada.

Lest we forget, Parliament’s recent report on religious discrimination was launched as a result of motion M-103, debated one year ago in Parliament.  M-103 itself was motivated largely by an attack on a Quebec City mosque on Jan. 29, 2017 which left six Muslim Canadians dead.  Motion M-103 and its resulting report were not some sort of “academic exercise” to assess a hypothetical problem.  Rather, Islamophobia and religious discrimination were real problems which clearly were resulting in death, lost job opportunities, exclusion and division in Canadian society.

So while M-103 and its resulting study had a mandate to look at all religious discrimination, there is no doubt that the scourge of Islamophobia was driving the M-103 process.  Global events had led to an upsurge in anti-Muslim sentiments in Canada.  Being a relatively new immigrant community, Canada’s nascent Muslim communities are less well-positioned to leverage the programs and assistance available to them.  Being less familiar with Canadians institutions, Canada’s Muslims are less likely to report the racism and hate crimes they face, or to otherwise invoke the protections afforded by Canadian society. 

For many across the political spectrum, the need for a new wave of consultations is not apparent, and the Trudeau government has provided no justification for last week’s announcements.  In such circumstances, it’s fair to ask, “What do we hope to learn from such consultations that we don’t already know.”  The main body of the M-103 report was almost 70 pages and offered 30 well-thought-out recommendations spanning the breadth of the concerns the committee had heard.  While recommendation #1 of the report made mention of additional consultations, it did not suggest that such consultations would be expansive, or a pre-requisite to other prompt and concrete action. 

Indeed, Canadian Heritage spokesperson Simon Ross suggested last week that the consultations wouldn’t be large-scale, but this is hardly reassuring to those who see the need for prompt action.  Past consultations carried out by the Trudeau government have taken months to complete and are inevitably followed by months required to develop a summary report. 

Another valid concern expressed by many is whether such consultations would simply create more polarization across Canadian society.  If Quebec’s Bouchard-Taylor commission on religious accommodation were any indication, such consultations seemed to deepen tensions.  The Commission’s hearings were packed, and tended to bring out individuals with the most extreme views across society.  Over time, the acrimony between competing views only seemed to worsen and expand as the Bouchard-Taylor commission moved from city to city. 

More recently, opposition to the Quebec government’s attempt to hold consultations around religious discrimination created such intense backlash that the Couillard government backtracked and repositioned its plan.  Last year’s rancorous debate around motion M-103 demonstrated that discussions around Islamophobia and religious discrimination tend to spawn angry and irrational rhetoric laced with “alternative facts.”  Those urging the federal Liberals to be cautious with more “consultations” are spot on.

There are blatant islamophobes across Canadians society – they can be found in comment pages across the Internet – but they are the exception.  The greater challenge faced by Canada’s Muslims is systemic racism: a racism whereby Mike’s résumé is chosen over Mohammed’s even though both are equally qualified for a job; a racism whereby the police dismiss complaints by a Muslim citizen because that individual dresses differently; a racism whereby a Canadian municipality approves zoning for a new church immediately, but takes two years to do the same for a new mosque. 

Nobody would argue that consultations are a bad thing.  But when they seem unjustified, are likely to exacerbate problems, and appear to delay real action, it’s right to question them.  The latest federal budget provided funding to enhance multiculturalism in Canada.  This funding could be used to implement several of the specific recommendations of the M-103 report: more resources for law enforcement to prevent Islamophobia and religious discrimination; more sensitivity training for government service employees; new funding for newly established institutions among Canada’s religious minorities. 

Canada’s Muslims face Islamophobia on a daily basis: missing out on jobs, facing obstacles to integration and enduring racist slurs.  They should no longer have to wait for action from this government. 


Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Join the newsletter Donate

See other recent stories:

The Conservatives' Jerusalem Promise Is Scheer Madness


In Case You Missed It, Parliament Issued Its M-103 Islamophobia Report


Is Singh’s NDP Prepared to Distinguish Itself?


When Will Canadians Get The Anti-Islamophobia Measures They Want?


Bill 62: Colonialism 101


Canada Must Learn From Past Arms Sales Folly


Israel is Being Singled Out – For Favouritism


Roger Waters' support For BDS strengthens his anti-war credibility


Israel's War Of Textbooks Comes to Canada


Give The Anti-Palestinian Rhetoric A Rest


Canada Must Do More Than Just Throw Money At Palestinian Refugees


UWO Rejects Pressure From Israeli Lobby Group Over UN Special Rapporteur


Whats Up With Treyf a Debatably Jewish Podcast


Canada's Flip-flop On West Bank Wines Betrays Canadian Consumers' Interests


Canada Now a Hawk On Nuclear Arms


Trudeau Government Blocks Direct Flights to Beirut


Niki Ashton represents new breed of Canadian leader


Abuse of Prisoners Is Intolerable, Whether in Palestine or Northern Ireland


Liberals Largely Insincere On Arms Trade Treaty Bill


Canadian Politicians Can’t Cherry Pick Malala Yousafzai’s Message


Dysfunction at the UN: The Saudis aren’t the only ones to blame


50 Years Of Israeli Occupation Is Far Too Long


Trudeau’s Simplistic Approach Won’t Work In Syria


Canadian Zionists Join World Wide Campaign to Mark Centenary of Balfour Declaration


Trudeau Must Not Rubber Stamp Trump’s Military Interventions


NDP Leaders Race Should Be About Who Can Beat Trudeau


How To Move Forward From The M-103 Islamophobia Debate


Why Has Israel Arrested The Leading Spokesperson for the BDS Movement?


To Sanction or Not To Sanction


Survey Results Dispel Notion of “New Anti-Semitism”